Proposed New ‘Office of the Homeowner Advocate’
By Paul Kiel, ProPublica – May 7, 2010 11:37 am EDT
An amendment to the financial reform bill filed recently by Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., and Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, would create a special office to assist homeowners who are facing problems with the administration’s mortgage modification program. The measure has White House support [1], but is opposed by the financial services industry.
Mortgage Servicers
As we’ve reported, homeowners and housing counselors frequently complain that mortgage servicers frequently lose financial documents [2] and make mistakes [3]—mistakes that can result in foreclosure [4]. Homeowners regularly wait several months [5] for an answer on their application.
About $75 billion has been earmarked for the program from the TARP [6], but very little of that has so far been spent owing to the small number of permanent modifications so far: about 228,000 as of March [7].
The amendment proposes a new “Office of the Homeowner Advocate” that would be devoted to solving homeowner problems with the program. Right now, homeowners with complaints are told to call the HOPE Hotline, which has a staff of counselors to handle escalations—a process that’s been criticized as ineffective [8].
[picapp align=”none” wrap=”false” link=”term=mortgage+reform&iid=1896936″ src=”a/3/e/7/Jesse_Jackson_Rallies_e4dd.jpg?adImageId=12804308&imageId=1896936″ width=”380″ height=”246″ /]
Office of Homeowner Advocate
Under the amendment, all homeowner complaints about servicers would go to this new “Office of the Homeowner Advocate” within the Treasury Department. That would effectively create an appeals process for homeowners who think they’ve been wrongly denied a modification—something that housing counselors and other consumer advocates have long said is desperately needed [9].
“A mandated homeowner’s advocate, built into the process and reportable to Congress, would counteract the servicer unresponsiveness we’ve heard so much about and be able to serve as a recourse for homeowners,” said Richard H. Neiman, superintendent of banks for New York State and a member of the Congressional Oversight Panel for the TARP. Neiman has been pushing for the creation of the office.
The office would have the power to penalize servicers for noncompliance with the program‘s guidelines, but would need the sign-off from Herb Allison, the Treasury official in charge of the TARP, to do so. The Treasury currently has the power to penalize services, but so far has not done so [10].
Financial Services Industry Opposition
The idea has already garnered opposition from the financial services industry. Scott Talbott, a lobbyist with the Financial Services Roundtable, which counts the largest mortgage servicers among its many members [11], said the group opposed the amendment because it would just create “another layer of bureaucracy that could actually slow” the program’s process. He also said there is already adequate oversight of the program.
One of the watchdogs that over-sees the TARP, the Government Accountability Office, reported in March (PDF) that servicers have widely varying ways of dealing with homeowner complaints and some were not systematically tracking them. Several tracked only written ones, the GAO said. Another servicer had closely tracked only those complaints that were addressed to a company executive.
“The unnecessary problems with HAMP are found mostly with servicers who have provided inadequate, inconsistent service to homeowners and delayed or denied homeowner assistance on a mass basis,” said Alys Cohen of the National Consumer Law Center.
Assessment
The amendment has support from Americans for Financial Reform [12] and a host of consumer advocate groups, including the Center for Responsible Lending, the Service Employees International Union and the United Auto Workers.
The amendment also specifies that any candidate for the homeowner advocate position would have to come from an advocacy background and cannot have worked for a servicer or the Treasury in the previous four years. The advocate’s office would be funded out of the TARP and close down after the federal program ends. The idea is modeled after the Internal Revenue Service’s “taxpayer advocate.” [13] It’s not clear when the amendment might come up for a vote.
Conclusion
And so, your thoughts and comments on this ME-P are appreciated. Do you agree with this new proposal? How might medical professionals and/or financial advisors be affected?
Feel free to review our top-left column, and top-right sidebar materials, links, URLs and related websites, too. Then, be sure to subscribe. It is fast, free and secure.
Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos
Speaker: If you need a moderator or speaker for an upcoming event, Dr. David E. Marcinko; MBA – Publisher-in-Chief of the Medical Executive-Post – is available for seminar or speaking engagements. Contact: MarcinkoAdvisors@msn.com
Get our Widget: Get this widget!
Our Other Print Books and Related Information Sources:
Practice Management: http://www.springerpub.com/prod.aspx?prod_id=23759
Physician Financial Planning: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/0763745790
Medical Risk Management: http://www.jbpub.com/catalog/9780763733421
Healthcare Organizations: www.HealthcareFinancials.com
Health Administration Terms: www.HealthDictionarySeries.com
Physician Advisors: www.CertifiedMedicalPlanner.com
Subscribe Now: Did you like this Medical Executive-Post, or find it helpful, interesting and informative? Want to get the latest ME-Ps delivered to your email box each morning? Just subscribe using the link below. You can unsubscribe at any time. Security is assured.
Link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/HealthcareFinancialsthePostForcxos
Sponsors Welcomed
And, credible sponsors and like-minded advertisers are always welcomed.
Link: http://healthcarefinancials.wordpress.com/2007/11/11/advertise
